Technical hiring intelligence

Know who can actually build before you hire.

HexaHire runs paid engineering evaluations for companies that need reliable signals on junior, mid-level, senior, staff, and principal developers.

48h typical report turnaround
5 role levels covered
360 code, design, communication

Built for lean hiring teams

We replace guesswork with structured technical evidence.

Every evaluation uses a role-specific work sample, a live structured interview, fraud controls, and a calibrated rubric. You get a clear hire/no-hire recommendation, risk notes, leveling guidance, and interview follow-ups for your final panel.

Tiered by evaluator seniority

Market-aligned technical evaluation pricing

Platform-only tools commonly charge by seat, credit, or assessment volume. HexaHire adds expert review, structured interviews, and decision-ready reporting, so higher-level roles cost more because senior evaluators spend more time on architecture, tradeoff analysis, and calibration.

J1

Junior Developer

Best for apprentices, bootcamp grads, interns, and entry-level engineers.

$395 per candidate
  • 60-minute coding and debugging task
  • Fundamentals rubric and growth-risk notes
  • Reviewed by mid/senior engineer
M2

Mid-Level Developer

For engineers expected to deliver features independently.

$695 per candidate
  • 90-minute realistic project exercise
  • Code quality, testing, and product judgment
  • Structured technical follow-up interview
P4

Staff / Principal

For technical leaders driving architecture across teams.

$1,850 per candidate
  • System design, strategy, and leadership signal
  • Portfolio or design-document review
  • Panel-ready evidence packet
E5

Executive Architecture

For principal-plus, founding engineer, CTO, and platform leadership hires.

$2,750 per candidate
  • Two-evaluator calibration review
  • Business impact and org-scale architecture
  • Board or founder summary option

Evaluation practice

Evidence over vibes, every time.

01

Role Calibration

We map the job to level, stack, must-have competencies, acceptable AI use, and business context before the candidate touches a task.

02

Work Sample

Candidates complete realistic coding, debugging, or architecture work instead of trivia-heavy puzzles.

03

Structured Interview

Every evaluator uses the same scoring rubric, probes, and score anchors for comparable candidate signals.

04

Decision Report

You receive a concise recommendation, scorecard, risks, follow-up questions, and leveling advice.

Industry benchmark

Pricing and practices informed by current market data.

Platform economics

CoderPad lists paid plans from $120/month for 5 tests or interviews monthly and $400/month for 30, with $25 overages. TestGorilla lists Plus from $400/month and charges assessment credits per candidate.

Human expert premium

Interview coaching marketplaces publicly cite $225+ mock technical interview sessions, supporting a higher price floor when an experienced engineer conducts and writes up an evaluation.

Best-practice hiring

Research and major-company hiring guidance favor structured interviews, work samples, consistent rubrics, candidate transparency, and human-centered feedback.

What clients get

A clean technical signal your hiring panel can use immediately.

Hire / No-hire recommendation Leveling confidence Code review notes Architecture risks AI-use observations Next interview probes

Start with one role

Send a job description. We will return an evaluation plan.

Use HexaHire for final-round validation, high-volume screening, fractional CTO support, or confidential executive technical diligence.